皇冠体育寻求亚洲战略合作伙伴,皇冠代理招募中,皇冠平台开放会员注册、充值、提现、电脑版下载、APP下载。

首页体育正文

新加“jia”坡博彩公司总行地址「zhi」(www.99cx.vip)_Judge delays decision on Latif corruption charges

admin2022-07-0816

新加坡博彩公司总行地址www.99cx.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育网址代理APP下载、皇冠体育网址会员APP下载、皇冠体育网址线路APP下载、皇冠体育网址登录APP下载的官方平台。新加坡博彩公司总行地址上最新新加坡博彩公司总行地址会员登录线路、新加坡博彩公司总行地址代理网址更新最快。新加坡博彩公司总行地址开放皇冠官方会员注册、皇冠官方代理开户等业务。

,

THE Sessions Court in Johor Baru today postponed decision on the case against former Johor executive councillor Abd Latif Bandi, his son, and a real estate consultant, who are facing 37 charges of corruption and money laundering over RM35.7 million.

Judge Kamarudin Kamsun, who was scheduled to deliver the verdict today, said there were still some arguments that needed to be submitted by parties involved and he would then rule on August 7.

“I need to listen to those arguments before making a decision. So, I can’t do it today, hence, a new date will be set,” he said.

Lawyer Salehuddin Saidin, represented Latif, 56, and his son, Ahmad Fauzan Hatim, 30, then applied for the court to hear the submission by the defence.

During the proceedings, the court heard submissions by the prosecution, represented by Deputy Director I, legal and prosecution division of the Malaysian Anti -Corruption Commission (MACC) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, and assisted by deputy public prosecutors Ahmad Akram Gharib and Mahadi Abdul Jumaat.

On June 14, 2017, Latif, Ahmad Fauzan and Amir Shariffuddin Abd Raub, 49, were charged with 33 counts of corruption and four counts of money laundering for a total of RM35.7 million, and they pleaded not guilty to all charges.

On April 21, 2019, Kamarudin acquitted and discharged the three of them of the 37 charges after finding the prosecution having failed to prove its case.

However, on November 7, 2021, the High Court ordered the former chairman of the state housing and local government committee and his co-defendants to enter their defence, after it overturned the Sessions Court verdict.

On the corruption charges, the three men are charged under section 28 (1) (C) of the MACC Act 2009, read together with section 16 (a) (B) of the same act.

They were also charged under section 32 (8) (c) and section 89 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti -Terrori *** Financing and Proceeds from Unlawful Activities (AMLA) Act 2001. – Bernama, June 26, 2022.


转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。

网友评论

1条评论
  • 2022-07-08 00:01:15

      经相关部《bu》门调【diao】查,7名死者皆来自着火的二‘er’楼办〖ban〗公室,其中(zhong)1名为纵火(huo)嫌【xian】疑人,1名‘ming’为律师。据《东亚日报》消息(xi),嫌疑人曾因投资资金提起诉讼,败诉后对对方律师怀恨在心,后于《yu》9日上午10时53分携带白布覆盖不明物体进入大楼。由于嫌疑人在进入律师事务所23秒后,该办公室立马出现了{liao}火花,警方怀疑嫌疑人‘ren’手持物体可能为易燃材料。此外 wai[,相关〖guan〗律师当日因出差并未在‘zai’律所工作,而其同事不幸遇难《nan》。有智慧有想法